![]() "Yeah, it's objective, but it's subjectively objective." "My utility function includes a term for the fulfillment of your utility function." "I'll cooperate if and only if the other person will cooperate if and only if I cooperate." "Beliefs should constrain anticipations." What would you say the probability of that event is, if your beliefs are true? I want to be with you, and I don’t foresee that changing in the near future. I am running on corrupted hardware after all. I like to think I’d do that, but I don’t fully trust myself. When the singularity comes that won’t be a problem anymore. ![]() This may sound a bit crazy right now, but hear me out… ![]() You know what they say: one man’s Modus Ponens is another man’s Modus Tollens What sort of things do Rationalists often say that triggers this sort of in-group recognition which could be popped into a short video? A few I can think of. When done right it totally triggers the in-group warm-fuzzies. (Not to be confused with the nearly-identically formatted "Shit X's Say to Y's" which is mainly a way for Y's to complain about X's). ![]() I assume everyone has run across at least one of the "Shit X's Say" format of videos? Such as Shit Skeptics Say. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |